District 4 U.S. Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Prescott, presents a certificate to the local winner of his annual Easter card contest in the gymnasium of the Colorado River Boys & Girls Clubs Bullhead City branch on Monday. Left to right: Gosar, winner Carrie Moss, and her father, Jon Moss. Gosar briefly answered questions from BGCCR members, most of whom wanted to know how many presidents Gosar has met. He answered he’s met President Barack Obama and former president George W. Bush. “My favorite is Donald Trump,” said one young man. Gosar answered, “He’s not president yet.”


KINGMAN — The U.S. congressman representing Mohave County held a public hearing Monday against a proposal to protect more than 1 million acres near the Grand Canyon.

U.S. Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Arizona, heard testimony in Kingman from local and state groups about the Grand Canyon Heritage National Monument. The proposed monument would protect 1.7 million acres near the Grand Canyon National Park in Northern Arizona from uranium mining. Much of that land is in Mohave County in the Arizona Strip.

In November, Gosar introduced legislation, HR-3946, which would update the 1906 Antiquities Act and would protect property and water rights and jobs from presidential abuse. The Republican congressman from Prescott also said that there is no evidence that uranium mining has a negative impact to the water, air or the environment.

Mohave Electric Cooperative Chief Executive Officer Tyler Carlson said the 1906 Antiquities Act needed to be updated to reflect the needs of 2016. The 100-year-old act was originally designated for the smallest area to preserve and protect objects.  He said designating public lands as a national monuments reduces right-of-way access for utility lines, which would have a negative economic impact.

Arizona Game and Fish Commission Chair Kurt Davis said the monument would negatively impact AG&F’s ability to manage the lands, restrict recreational use, be devastating to water resources and damage rural economies by restricting public access to the lands. He also said wildlife is worse off with public lands being designated as national monuments and there would be an increase chance for a catastrophic wildfire.

Sierra Club Chapter Director Sandy Bahr said the lands around the Grand Canyon are part of its watershed and are already public lands, national forests and BLM lands. The national monument declaration would protect this area from future uranium mining and protect wildlife habitat and the remaining old-growth ponderosa pines.

“This is not a land grab, unless you think protecting public lands for the public and for future generations is a land grab,” Bahr said.

Bahr also said it is a myth by saying the act would restrict the use of the land by cattlemen, sportsman and the recreating public. In fact, the proposed monument allows for grazing, recreation, hunting, fishing and motorized access to continue, Bahr said.

Decisions would also continue to be made in an open and public process in cooperation with state agencies, tribes and hunters or anglers. Language on the proposal protects existing state, tribal and private water rights. It would also allow the cutting and removal of timber within the monument, Bahr said.

American Clean Energy Resources Trust Executive Director Pamela Hill said there was a bipartisan comprise that would allow uranium mining in Northern Arizona but the national monument would ban mining and would cause the loss of hundreds of high-paying uranium mining jobs.

The area in Northern Mohave County has one of the largest deposits of uranium ore and would supply clean energy to millions of customers for 40 years, Hill said. Hill also called U.S. Rep Ann Kirkpatrick D-Arizona “deluded” for calling the monument a win-win for Arizona. ACERT is a lobbying group for uranium mining.

Mike Schroder and Dwight Kadar of Arizona Liberty out of Sedona both spoke of the decrease in recreation activities, restriction of property and water rights and restriction of economic opportunities. National monument rules have more government regulations than other public lands. Schroder said that federal Payment in Lieu of Taxes pays counties 62 cent per acre where the average property tax revenue of private land is $50 an acre.

The U.S. Geological Survey previously stated that uranium mining could impact the environment of the Grand Canyon and the Colorado River watershed. Increased levels of radioactive materials and heavy metals could flow into the Grand Canyon and downstream into the Colorado River.

Elevated levels of uranium has been found in springs in areas where there has been uranium mining. Horn Creek is still contaminated by low levels of radiation from the Orphan Mine, which closed in 1969, in the Grand Canyon.

(3) comments


So, how much did Paul Gosar get from the uranium mining industry?


I truly though Paul Gosar was different. He's not. He's bought out by big money. The federal government is holding that land for us. For public use. The state wants to sell that land to the highest bidder. And that would not be us. The county is blaming all the environmental damage on the burros in our state. What the hell do they think uranium mining is going to do??? Or the 950 miles of off roading? What will that do to our deserts? Our desert wildlife doesn't stand a chance against all the county land grabbing thats being done. This is wrong. Its why we all moved to the desert to begin with. To get away from all that city crap.

Joe Bardswich

Cubbybear and bellman, we need interested and active folks like you to understand the situation with the federal government taking control. Please read the testimony of
Arizona Game and Fish Commission Chairman Kurt R. Davis. He really provides good info to get insight into how difficult it is for the feds to manage the lands they already have and the negative effect poor management has on our desert wildlife and the environment.

Re uranium. It is there, and it will continue to leach into the watershed if left dormant. That is how one explores for uranium and other minerals, analyze water and soil samples and follow the train upstream to the source. Americans are number 1 in environmental mining. Do not ban mining and the major contribution it makes to our economy. Regulate it and enforce the rules against any bad actors. In this day and age, it makes economic sense for mining companies to mine responsibly.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.